By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.
Articles

Why Traditional SIEM Isn’t Enough—Peris.ai Brings Real Intelligence

May 27, 2025
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms were once hailed as the ultimate solution for centralized logging, correlation, and security monitoring. But in today’s complex threat landscape—marked by polymorphic malware, AI-powered phishing, cloud-native exploits, and lateral movement across hybrid infrastructures—SIEM alone isn’t enough.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) platforms were once hailed as the ultimate solution for centralized logging, correlation, and security monitoring. But in today’s complex threat landscape—marked by polymorphic malware, AI-powered phishing, cloud-native exploits, and lateral movement across hybrid infrastructures—SIEM alone isn’t enough.

CISOs and SOC leads are realizing a painful truth:

You’re collecting logs, but not catching threats.

This article explores the limitations of traditional SIEMs, the operational burden they impose, and the gaps they leave exposed. More importantly, it reveals how Peris.ai delivers real intelligence through a unified, AI-powered platform that elevates detection, triage, and response beyond what SIEMs were ever designed to handle.

What Traditional SIEMs Were Built For—and Why That’s No Longer Enough

A Brief History of SIEM

SIEM platforms originated in the early 2000s to help organizations:

  • Collect logs from diverse systems
  • Correlate events for anomalies
  • Store logs for compliance and auditing
  • Provide dashboards for SOC analysts

In theory, this should enable threat detection across an enterprise. But in practice?

Where They Fall Short Today

  • High noise-to-signal ratio
  • Lack of contextual intelligence
  • Delayed detection due to static rules
  • Minimal automation
  • Complex integration requirements
  • Expensive to scale

And perhaps worst of all:

SIEMs tell you what happened—but not why it matters or what to do next.

The Pain Points of Relying Solely on SIEM

A. Alert Fatigue from Volume-Based Detection

SIEMs generate tens of thousands of alerts daily, most of which:

  • Are false positives
  • Require human correlation
  • Lack relevance to current threats

Analysts waste time sifting through noise instead of investigating real threats.

“Our SIEM gives us 5,000 alerts a day. But only five of them matter—and we often miss those five.”

B. Lack of Threat Context and Intelligence

Traditional SIEMs:

  • Rely on static rules and signatures
  • Have no understanding of threat actor behavior
  • Don’t enrich alerts with threat intelligence
  • Can’t differentiate between a misconfigured script and an active attack

This leads to both underreaction and overreaction.

C. Blindspots Across Cloud, Remote, and BYOD Assets

Modern infrastructures include:

  • Cloud-native workloads
  • Remote employee endpoints
  • IoT/OT devices
  • SaaS applications

Most SIEMs were not built to ingest telemetry from these sources effectively, leaving major visibility gaps attackers can exploit.

D. Delayed Detection and Slow Mean Time to Respond (MTTR)

SIEMs often require:

  • Manual log analysis
  • Multiple system pivots
  • Human-driven ticket generation

This slows down detection, investigation, containment, and recovery—sometimes turning a minor event into a full-scale breach.

E. High Operational Overhead and Complexity

Security teams struggle with:

  • Maintaining complex ingestion pipelines
  • Writing and updating correlation rules
  • Managing licensing based on data volume
  • Making sense of disconnected dashboards

The result? More tools, more complexity—but less clarity.

Why Intelligence > Data in Modern SOCs

Threats in 2025 are:

  • Faster: Exploits surface and spread within hours of disclosure.
  • Smarter: Adversaries use AI to evade detection and automate phishing.
  • Quieter: "Living-off-the-land" techniques leave minimal logs.
  • Ubiquitous: Attacks target identity, endpoint, cloud, and infrastructure simultaneously.

What’s needed isn’t just raw logs—it’s intelligence-driven operations.

  • Threat Context Helps analysts prioritize alerts and link to real-world actors
  • Behavioral Analytics Detects anomalies across time, users, and devices
  • Autonomous Triage Speeds response without overloading analysts
  • Full-Stack Visibility Covers cloud, endpoint, network, and identity systems
  • Cross-System Orchestration Enables coordinated, AI-powered response

How Peris.ai Elevates the SOC: Intelligence Over Logs

Rather than replace SIEM, Peris.ai augments and orchestrates it—building an intelligence-first architecture that connects signals, enriches context, and automates response.

Peris.ai’s intelligent cybersecurity ecosystem is driven by key components:

Brahma Fusion (AI Playbook Engine)

  • Agentic AI playbooks that adapt to context
  • Real-time triage of incoming data
  • Automated investigation and response
  • Reduces alert fatigue by up to 44%

Peris.ai IRP (Incident Response Platform)

  • Centralized dashboard for case management
  • Aggregates data from EDR, SIEM, NVM, CTI
  • Executes workflows from detection to remediation
  • Tracks investigation timelines and response SLAs

INDRA (Cyber Threat Intelligence)

  • Real-time CTI feed
  • Maps IOCs and behavior to MITRE ATT&CK
  • Scores alerts based on exploitability and actor intent
  • Prioritizes cases with contextual risk scoring

NVM (Network Visibility Monitoring)

  • AI-enhanced packet inspection and traffic correlation
  • Lateral movement detection
  • Identifies blindspots across segmented environments
  • Integrates with endpoint and cloud telemetry

What Makes Peris.ai Different From a SIEM?

Log aggregation

  • Traditional SIEM: ✅
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅

Static correlation

  • Traditional SIEM: ✅
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅ + contextual scoring

Behavioral detection

  • Traditional SIEM: ❌
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅

Threat actor enrichment

  • Traditional SIEM: ❌
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅ (via INDRA)

Real-time response

  • Traditional SIEM: ❌
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅

Alert triage automation

  • Traditional SIEM: ❌
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: ✅ (via Brahma Fusion)

Case management

  • Traditional SIEM: Manual
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: Integrated (IRP)

Cloud/IoT/BYOD visibility

  • Traditional SIEM: Limited
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: Broad & scalable

Cross-platform coordination

  • Traditional SIEM: ❌
  • Peris.ai Ecosystem: Seamless

Real-World Example: A Missed Threat Becomes a Breach

Company: Mid-size Tech Firm

  • Deployed a popular SIEM platform
  • SIEM flagged abnormal login patterns from an internal system
  • Alert was ignored as "false positive"
  • Weeks later, data exfiltration occurred
  • Investigation revealed lateral movement, PowerShell abuse, and outbound C2 connections

Why It Failed:

  • SIEM did not enrich with threat intel
  • No behavioral analysis was done
  • No triage automation existed
  • Endpoint and network data were siloed

With Peris.ai in Place:

  • Alert enriched by INDRA: maps to TA505 campaign
  • Brahma Fusion triggers playbook: isolates endpoint
  • NVM confirms DNS tunneling pattern
  • IRP opens case, assigns incident manager
  • Full RCA completed in <2 hours

Getting Started: Modernizing Beyond SIEM

Step 1: Identify Gaps

Audit your current detection workflows:

  • Are alerts being investigated timely?
  • Is context consistently missing?
  • Are cloud and endpoint blindspots present?

Step 2: Integrate Sources

Connect SIEM to EDR, NVM, and cloud telemetry. Use Peris.ai IRP to correlate and manage workflows centrally.

Step 3: Enrich with Threat Intelligence

Use INDRA to overlay CTI context on all alerts. Prioritize based on actor activity, CVE maturity, and campaign alignment.

Step 4: Automate Triage

Use Brahma Fusion to build intelligent playbooks. Reduce L1/L2 burdens and streamline escalation.

Step 5: Shift to Case-Based Response

Every high-fidelity alert becomes a managed case with assigned ownership, response timeline, and full audit trail.

What Success Looks Like with Peris.ai

MTTD (Mean Time to Detect)

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: 5–12 hours
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: <20 minutes

MTTR (Mean Time to Respond)

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: Days
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: <2 hours

Alert Noise

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: High
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: 40%+ reduction

Missed True Positives

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: Weekly
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: Rare, contextualized alerts

SOC Burnout & Turnover

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: High
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: Lower with automation

Compliance Reporting Burden

  • Pre-Peris.ai SIEM: Manual
  • With Peris.ai Intelligence: Automated via IRP

Conclusion: SIEM Alone Can’t Save You—But Intelligence Can

Traditional SIEM tools were built for an earlier era. They excel at log aggregation but fall short when it comes to:

  • Intelligent correlation
  • Threat context
  • Real-time triage
  • Automated, cross-platform response

In today’s landscape, visibility is not enough. Intelligence is what drives action.

That’s what Peris.ai brings:

  • Brahma Fusion for AI-driven decision-making
  • IRP for response orchestration
  • INDRA for contextual CTI
  • NVM for uncovering what SIEM misses

Together, they transform fragmented toolchains into a cohesive, intelligent defense ecosystem.

Still relying on logs without intelligence? It’s time to evolve. Explore how Peris.ai can modernize your SOC at https://peris.ai

There are only 2 type of companies:
Those that have been hacked, and
those who don't yet know they have been hacked.
Protect Your Valuable Organization's IT Assets & Infrastructure NOW
Request a Demo
See how it works and be amaze.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Interested in becoming our partner?
BECOME A PARTNER